ANTENNAS AND TRANSMISSION LINES
Yagi antennas; parabolic reflectors; circular polarization; loading coils; top loading; feed point impedance of electrically short antennas; antenna Q; RF grounding
How much does the gain of an ideal parabolic dish antenna change when the operating frequency is doubled?
Note that the gain of a parabolic antenna is governed by the following:
\[G = \frac{ 4\pi{A} }{ \lambda^2 }e_A\]
Where:
It is clear that by doubling the frequency, the wavelength is halved. Using proportional reasoning, we see that substituting \(\frac{\lambda}{2}\) for \(\lambda\) results in a change in \(G\) by a factor of \(4\).
In decibels, \(10\log_{10}(4)\) is equal to \(6.02\text{ dB}\). Hence, the correct answer is "Gain is increased by \(6\text{ dB}\)".
Hint: The ideal value is the highest value.
Silly memory aid: "para" means fo(u)r in Spanish, and you'd need 6 dB to quadruple power
Last edited by samdypaulson. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9d
How can linearly polarized Yagi antennas be used to produce circular polarization?
Hint: Only one answer has the word perpendicular in it.
Hint: only one answer has 'BOOM' in it :)
The key here is that the two Yagis are overlaid on the same boom. The result is two sets of elements, both pointing the same direction, with one set rotated 90° along the axis of the boom at right angles to the other.
The distractors talk about arranging the antennas in parallel or linearly. Neither of those things make for good circles – you have to have perpendicular angles out of phase to make the spiral wave.
Check out this great video from Khan Academy that explains linear and circular polarization of electromagnetic waves.
Last edited by kd7bbc. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9d
Where should a high Q loading coil be placed to minimize losses in a shortened vertical antenna?
Due to the fact that short verticals have a low radiation resistance, they are naturally ineffective so you will need to do whatever you can to make them as efficient as possible.
An HF mobile antenna loading coil should have a high ratio of reactance to resistance to minimize losses.
A high-Q loading coil should be placed near the center of the vertical radiator to minimize losses in a shortened vertical antenna.
Last edited by kd7bbc. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9d
Why should an HF mobile antenna loading coil have a high ratio of reactance to resistance?
A small loading coil simply inserts a series inductive reactance that cancels capacitive antenna reactance.
By using a mobile antenna loading coil you will minimize ground related losses.
Mnemonic hint: High Ratio = Maximum Efficiency.
Last edited by im.n2txs@gmail.com. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9d
What usually occurs if a Yagi antenna is designed solely for maximum forward gain?
Essentially, there is a point of diminishing returns when you're trying to maximize forward gain, after which the front lobe spreads out more and front to back ratio starts to fall off again.
There's a great explanation on the ARRL forum: http://www.arrl.org/forum/topics/view/118
Now: https://web.archive.org/web/20200805195036/http://www.arrl.org/forum/topics/view/118
Hint: Just remember Maximum gain, Minimum ratio
Last edited by cq.n8gmz. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9g
What happens to the SWR bandwidth when one or more loading coils are used to resonate an electrically short antenna?
Bandwidth is inversely proportional to quality factor Q, and \[Q = \frac{\text{reactance}}{\text{resistance}}\] Thus, adding reactance reduces (decreases) the bandwidth.
Last edited by samdypaulson. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9d
What is an advantage of using top loading in a shortened HF vertical antenna?
Eliminate Distractors:
Lower Q - Actually raises Q by tuning antenna to be resonant
Higher Losses - Not an advantage
Greater structural strength - Nonsense
Only real answer is Improved radiation efficiency
Top loading is a methodology which increases radiation resistance, hence efficiency, even if the ground plane is substandard; seemingly a ubiquitous vertical antenna shortcoming. A top loaded vertical antenna has several advantages over the conventional vertical, but the biggest advantage is that it's shorter in length.
Source: Antenna 013: 20 Meter Top Loaded Vertical
Maximizing Efficiency in HF Mobile Antennas
Last edited by xjpx. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9d
What happens as the Q of an antenna increases?
The Q or Q-Factor, when it relates to antennas, is simply an inverse measure of the bandwidth in which that antenna is useable.
Q is defined as the center frequency divided by the bandwidth. So something with a higher Q would have a smaller bandwidth around its designed center frequency.
Example: You have a dipole which is made for 14.2 MHz and has a bandwidth (acceptable VSWR) of \(\pm 250\) kHz (0.5 MHz bandwidth)
The Q factor would be: \[Q=\frac{14.2}{0.5}=28.4\]
If the bandwidth were to be cut in half, the Q factor would double accordingly.
Last edited by kt4obx. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9b
What is the function of a loading coil used as part of an HF mobile antenna?
The coil (inductor) is added to cancel out the capacitance already present in the circuit to try to achieve resonance.
It also facilitates a method to electrically shorten an antenna to "tune" to lower frequencies than the intended "designed" antenna length.
Silly hint: coil cancels capacitive reactance
Last edited by kd7bbc. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9d
What happens to feed-point impedance at the base of a fixed length HF mobile antenna when operated below its resonant frequency?
Radiation resistance represents the portion of an antenna’s impedance that corresponds to power successfully radiated as radio waves, as if the power were dissipated by a resistor. A higher radiation resistance generally means the antenna radiates more efficiently.
At the resonant frequency, radiation resistance is maximized, resulting in the most efficient radiation. Below resonance, the impedance becomes more reactive (usually capacitive), reducing the radiation resistance and making the antenna less efficient at radiating energy.
Thus, radiation resistance decreases below resonance.
Memory aid:
Below resonance = Resistance decreases. "Below" = Decrease.
Last edited by kd7bbc. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9d
Which of the following conductors would be best for minimizing losses in a station's RF ground system?
A wide, flat strap (preferably NOT braided, same reason as NOT stranded) has more surface area than an equivalent gauge wire. RF energy travels on the surface of the conductor. Greater surface area = greater conductor. Commercial broadcast stations have solid 00 ga. RF ground cables.
Last edited by xjpx. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9b
Which of the following would provide the best RF ground for your station?
The best ground is a low-resistance connection to earth. While a water pipe might accomplish that, ground rods is the answer they want on the test.
The reason why the water pipe is not the best answer is that usually the condition of the pipe and its connection to the ground is unknown. For example, it is likely to be corroded. ground rods are clad in copper and designed such that they don't have the corrosion problems of the average water pipe.
Another reason is that the metal section of a water pipe may be very short because someone at some point replaced the water main with PVC pipe but you're unable to see it since it is buried.
The other answers are wrong because: a resistor doesn't improve your ground, it only makes it worse, and a series RF choke either does nothing or makes things worse.
Hint: Ground=Earth.
Last edited by katzelover. Register to edit
Tags: arrl chapter 9 arrl module 9b